The End (Acts IV and V)

The ending...what to say about it? I was curious about how they were going to wrap it all up with act five, since it was all pretty much taken care of in act four, but I suppose it was an ending. I enjoyed the mini play which the actors performed, however it felt as if the last act was simply tagged on because there needed to be another act. Everything had been resolved in act four and the play would have been fine without the extra act.

I also feel a bit cheated that Helena easily accepts Demetrius after she wakes up. I understand that it was all supposed to be portrayed as a dream, but obviously Demetrius didn't like her when they entered the woods and now he suddenly does? And she doesn't question this at all? I feel as if simply saying 'it was all a dream' was to wrap up everything, including certain things that can't be wrapped up in a dream. What about the group of actors seeing Bottom as an ass? Don't they remember that? Yes, indeed, I feel a little cheated out of a highly satisfactory ending.

That being said, I really did enjoy the little play the actors performed. Especially as they kept messing up. I'm excited to see the little play in the movie, to see if it's just as funny as it was when I read the excerpt.

The Fairer Sex

Of course Shakespeare wrote several hundred years before the feminist movement (and feminist philosophy), but his play offers us a nice opportunity to reflect on notions of femininity and the perception of women in Britain around 1600. Do you think women are fairly portrayed in the play? Does Shakespeare seem to you to be misogynistic, or does he stand up for the rights of women?

A Midsummer Night's Dream

I love reading this play. It's super easy to read and quite enjoyable. When I first heard that we were going to start reading Shakespeare I was pretty worried. But as soon as I started to read the play, I got hooked. I love that we can also use the spark notes to help us out. I admit, I do get lost sometimes as I'm reading the play, or not really lost, but don't understand Shakespeare's old fashioned writing. I read Hamlet in High school and it was pretty good. But this play is so much better. So much Drama and Irony. I wonder what was going through his head as he wrote this. Watching the movie is even better. It gives me a visual, and helps me understand the play a lot better. I like reading the play first though, and then watching the movie. And thanks spark notes for the Modern translation, because If I were to watch the movie without reading the play, I'd be pretty lost, and lose interest. But so far I really enjoy reading and watching the play. I love the supernatural aspect to the play, like the fairies, and all of those fun mystical creatures. It transforms this play into a fun story. I can't imagine what it would be like without it all. I mean, it could still be interesting, but it wouldn't have the same effect it has now.

Do Things Happen For A Reason?

Do things happen for a reason? Well in my opinion, I say yes. But I guess everyone has a different opinion. I have always believed that things happen for a reason, maybe it's because my mother has always said this to me ever since I was little. So do things happen for a reason? It might be that I was raised in the Christianity faith, so my opinion might involve a bit of religion. God, supposedly has a plan for everyone, and decides your destiny. Some part of me believes this, but the other doesn't. I'm getting lost here, and I've completely lost my train of thought. It's sort of like the saying 'When one door closes, another one opens'. Whenever something bad happens to me, I always say to myself, 'it's okay Evander, things happen for a reason' and whether or not I believe this, something good always happens. Even if it's something small. I'm not saying that there's some supernatural thing or whatever you want to call it out there that governs what we do, or what happens. But this to me can also be related to Karma. You know, you do bad things you get extra bad, or if you do good things, then things go better for you. As for the chaos and randomness, welll that's another thing. Of course there's gonna be chaos. Us humans having free will and all that. We try to keep order, and follow set rules, but you're gonna have those days when you feel like not following any rules, and being FREE. Okay, not really free, but feel a lot better. But just for one day or so. There could be many theories as to if there are reasons to the things people do. But who really knows.

a midsummer nights dream

I'm really enjoying this play, and its ironic portrayal of love. I especially enjoyed his portrayal of the actors. especially considering shakespeare was a playwrite, its surprising, he appears so critical of them. They are all shown as narcissistic, eager to show off, self centered and clueless. They all seem to be so absorbed in the play that they're almost out of touch with realilty and they all think that all the people around them enjoy their acting as much as they do when they might be indifferent. (especially bottom) I think that this might tie in with his beleif that we are all actors, and that our personalities greatly depend on the people we are around and the roles we are put into. And just like the actors we are unaware of this, and as we get more absorbed in our roles the less we are able to see of reality.

Reading Shakespeer is not so fun for me, but i do enjoy reading new things i have never read before. In high school all Shakespeer was boring to me i guess because all we did was reading, and no watching a movie for visual processing. Reading Shakespeer has been more interesting because i have more knowledge of some of the theories behind the plays. I still need more understanding about some of the written language Shakespeer has, i get confused sometimes. Reading Shakespeer is a little frustrating for me but i like it.

3/23/11

I'm actually enjoying reading Shakespeare, which was definitely not the case in high school. It has become even more interesting to read now knowing Shakespeare's skeptical theories. I believe the reason Shakespeare is so popular is because of his skeptical views. No control of events, never knowing what people are thinking, and not being sure of anything creates drama and interest in his plays.

Act III

I really enjoyed reading this act; characterized by such playful use of puns and dramatic irony, Shakespeare really drew me into the tension of his masterfully tangled love parallelogram (I hypothesize would be the appropriate geometric shape to describe these poor, love-struck Athenians' dilemma) that is plagued by the disillusionment of a funny, mischievious fellow named Robin Goodfellow (AKA Puck) who drops the love potion that Oberon, King of the Fairies, gave him into the wrong Athenian's eyes. Thus the drama commences when Lysander awakes after Puck poisons him and he averts his love from Hermia and confesses his newfound devotion to Helena. Unconvinced of his honesty and unsure of his motives, Helena reprimands Lysander for his mockery and emplores that he follow her no more. Oberon later identifies Puck's mistake and demmands Puck correct his fault. So Puck sets out to repair his wrongdoings and doses Demitrius with a hefty hit of love juice. BAM! He wakes, he sees Helena, he is in love. However, Helena is only further unamused by what she percieves as a jest against her unrequitted love. Hermia enters the scene and beseeches that Lysander explain his sly flight from her during the middle of the night and his new affection for Helena, who is in disbelief for she believes her childhood-friend is the culprit behind these mean men's cruel joke. They all challenge to deul, except for Helena who still thinks this is all just trickery, but are misled into different areas of the woods by Puck so that he may mend the mess he made. Exhausted from pursuing and evading, the Athenians slip into a sound slumber.

Shakespeare: Rhetoric and the Mob-Mentality

I've been thinking at length about Shakespeare as a philosopher, or rather, examples in his writing that display his views, which brought to my attention Julius Caesar, my favorite of his plays. This play deals at length with the power of the smooth tongue: rhetoric. And, going hand-in-hand with rhetoric, Shakespeare toys with the concept of the "mob-mentality," something he often dwelt on. For these reasons, Julius Caesar became my favorite play, because it so expertly exemplifies how easily people can be swayed by a skilled speaker, and terrifyingly so. This of course is most potently played out in Marc Anthony's famous speech, "Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears." That line in itself portrays Shakespeare's critical understanding of rhetoric and the public ear. When juxtaposed with Brutus' opening line. "Romans, countrymen, and lovers! Hear me for my/ cause and be silent that you may hear," it is painfully clear how deeply Shakespeare understands the power of logos, ethos, and pathos. Notice how Marc Antony begins with friends, as opposed to Brutus who began with Romans. In doing this, Marc Anthony is bringing the public to his level and creating an emotional bond with them by calling them his friends. Whereas Brutus gives a much colder and distant plea by simply calling them Romans. Marc Anthony furthers his manipulation through the word, "Honorable." He, quite literally, twists the meaning of the word and uses it against his opponents. Had he outright condemned Caesar's killers, he would have lost his emotional appeal: by calling them honorable and speaking of them as if defending them, Marc Anthony renders himself a wounded victim, as if he were a friend who has been wronged, but still loves those who wronged him. In doing this, the crowd further binds themselves to him, feels sorry for him, and begins to side with him, as seen when one Plebeian shouts, "Poor soul! His eyes are red as fire with weeping," and "There's not a nobler man in Rome than Anthony." Anthony has now established himself with the crowd, and they trust him. From there he begins to stir the crowd to action with emotional appeals over and over again. He brings the crowd over to Caesar's body, to show them the wounds that brought his death. And here, he deals a potent blow; "If you have tears, prepare to shed them now...Look, in this place ran Cassius' dagger through...Through this the well-beloved Brutus stabbed,/ and , as he plucked his cursed steel away,/ mark how the blood of Caesar followed it,/ as rushing out of doors to be resolved/if Brutus so unkindly knocked or no." From here, the mob-mentality takes over, as the crowd becomes blind with rage as they scream, "Revenge! About! Seek! Burn! Fire! Kill! Slay!/ Let not a traitor live!" There is a great deal more in his speech, and in the play itself, that further builds from this, and I highly recommend reading it.

Act III

The idea that we're all left to randomness and chaos is highly evident in Act III, especially when we get to scene two with Oberon. He seems to be very annoyed and angered that Puck messed up on a simple task, but Puck shrugs it off as fate and is instead just having a good time. I like the contrast between these two characters and ideas. I find it especially nice how closely their associated with each other in the play as well.

The story is going wonderful, I really want to read more, but I'm waiting so to not ruin myself and to have a nice discussion in class. I'm not too happy with helena's character development so far. I understand her fear of being suddenly loved and how it can be seen as mockery, but she seems hell bent on not believing that anything good can ever happen to her. She expects misery and sorrow to be her only companions it seems. Again, I sympathize with her, but not even for one second does she seem to entertain the idea that she's loved.


I predict that she will still refuse Demetrius by the end of the play.
I also predict that things will not go swimmingly with Oberon and his plans for kidnapping the Indian boy.

I'm having fun re-reading 'A Midsummer Nights Dream', it's been a few years since I read it last. For me, it helps that I'm familiar with the movie, because it stays true to the script, and sticks in my memory better.
I'm having a lot less luck with my paper. I have such conflicting ideas that I can't decide how to pick a topic, and then decide what my philosophy about it is. I've narrowed it down to either "What can we know?" or, "How should we live?". These are such huge questions that we're supposed to have a definite opinion on, and I don't think my head's that organized.

Things happen for a reason?

The notion of causality is one of the three main philosophical issues Shakespeare tackles in his work. He tends toward a skeptical view -- things happen for no reason. What do you think -- is there any rhyme or reason to what happens in the world, or are we at the mercy of chaos and randomness?

Helpful link

Most people already know about this, but I thought I'd post it anyway just in case someone finds it useful. Sparknotes offers "No fear Shakespeare" for free on their website. They also sell the books in most bookstores, I might have even seen it it the art-supply store, but don't quote me on that. It features Shakespeare's original text, and right next to every line, is an interpreted, modern-English version of it. You can read the original and refer to the translation when you get stuck. It's really easy to get lazy, or find yourself in a time bind, and just read the translated text, but do try to keep in mind that Shakespeares language (at least in my opinion) is most beautiful in its original form so you really shouldn't completely abandon it.

Here is the link to No Fear Shakespeare: A Midsummer Night's Dream

http://nfs.sparknotes.com/msnd/

Happy reading! Hope you all had a fun, restful, spring break :)

A Midsummer Night's Dream

I'm really loving this play! Not too surprised though, because I usually enjoy Shakespeare's plays. I'd love to read his sonnets someday; I've heard so much good praise about them. Act 2 ends at great place; I'm so excited to see how it all ends up. The fairies are my favorite characters thus far. I'm simply enchanted by how they sing, frolic, and dance to control the seasons and the animals. It would be so much fun to be one of them. While the fairies touch upon my imagination, the human characters resonate reality for me. Most of Shakespeares characters are always so easy to relate to, which is saying something given that these plays are written for a totally different audience in very different times. Sometimes I get caught up, as I'm sure we all do, in my emotions. I feel singled out and misunderstood; its refreshing to see people feeling, thinking, and going through some of the same things I did or am going through, as far back as the 16th century. Even though I know the stories are made-up, they still, like most made-up things, are inspired by real emotions and situations, which for me is reassuring and quite comical to realize that I'm not the only person in history to ever feel a certain way. It lessens the severity of a situation or emotion and even gives it a bit of perspective. I guess I just feel more human in a way.

Once again I'm really excited to see how this tangled web concludes!

The History of Race/Ethnicity Philosophy

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_definitions_of_race#Ancient_Greek_theories


It is interesting to me how what we think of race today was so constructed by so many over the years. You should all read a bit of this if you want your minds to be bent.